The Chinese yuan has appreciated by more than 27.5% since 2005, when   the People’s  Bank of China (“PBOC”) formally acceded to international   pressure and  began to relax the yuan-dollar peg. For China-watchers  and  economists,  that the Yuan will continue to appreciate is thus a  given.  There is no  question of 
if, but rather of 
when and 
to what extent.   But what if the  prevailing wisdom is wrong? What if the yuan is now   fairly valued, and  economic fundamentals no longer necessitate a   further rise?
 
Prior to the 2005 revaluation, economists had argued that the yuan  (also known as the Chinese RMB) was 
undervalued by 15% – 40%,    and American politicians had used this as a basis for proposing a   27.5%  across-the-board tariff on all Chinese imports. Given that the   yuan has  now appreciated by this exact margin (and by even more when   inflation is  taken into account), shouldn’t this alone be enough to   silence the  critics, without even having to look at the picture on the   ground? How  can Senator Charles Schumer 
continue to press for further  appreciation when the yuan’s rise exceeds his initial demands?  Alas, election   season is upon us, and we can’t hope to make political  sense out of   this issue. We can, however, attempt to analyze the  economic sense of   it.
China manipulates the value of the yuan in order to give a    competitive advantage to Chinese exporters, goes the conventional line   of thinking. Look no further than the Chinese trade surplus for evidence   of  this, right? As it turns out, China’s trade surplus is shrinking   rapidly. In  2006, it was a whopping 11% of GDP. Last year, it had   fallen to 5%, and  it is 
projected by the World Bank to settle below 3% for each of the next  two years. Thanks to a first   quarter trade deficit – the first in over  seven years – China’s trade   surplus may account for a negligible portion  (~.2%) of GDP growth in   2010. 

With this in mind, why would the PBOC even think about allowing the    RMB  to appreciate further? According to one perspective, the narrowing    trade imbalance is only temporary. When commodities prices settle and    global demand fully recovers, a wider trade surplus will follow. In    fact, the IMF forecasts China’s current surplus will rise to 8% by    2016. As you can see from the chart below (courtesy of 
The Economist),   however, the IMF’s forecasts  have proven to be too pessimistic for at   least the last three years, and  it now has very little credibility.   Besides, China’s economy is  gradually reorienting itself away from   exports and towards domestic  spending. As a resident of China, I can   certainly attest to this  phenomenon, and the last few years has seen an   explosion in the number  of cars on the road, domestic tourism, and   conspicuous consumption.

A better argument for further RMB appreciation comes in the form of    inflation. At 5.4%, inflation is officially nearing a 3-year high, and    there is evidence that the 
PBOC already recognizes that allowing the RMB  to keep rising represents its best tool for containing this problem. It  has 
already raised banks’ 
required reserve ratio several times, but  there is a limit to what this can accomplish.   Meanwhile, the PBOC  remains reluctant to raise interest rates because   it will invite further  
“hot-money” inflows (estimated at more than $100 Billion per year, if  not much higher) and potentially 
destabilize the banking sector. By  raising the value of the yuan, the PBOC can blunt the impact of 
rising  commodities prices and other inflationary forces.
In  fact, some think that the PBOC will quicken the pace of   appreciation, a  view that as supported by last month’s .9% rise. Others   think that a  once-off appreciation would be more effective, and is  hence  more  likely. This would not only remove the motivation for  further  hot-money  inflows, but would also reduce the PBOC’s need to  continue   accumulating foreign exchange reserves. At $3 trillion+  ($1.15 trillion   of which are held in US Treasury Securities), these  reserves are  already  a massive headache for policymakers. Merely  stating the  obvious, PBOC  Governor Zhou Xiaochuan has officially  called the  reserves “
really too  much.” (It’s worth pointing out that the promotion of the yuan as an  international currency is 
backfiring in some ways, causing the reserves  to balloon even faster). 

 For  the record, I think that the Chinese yuan is pretty close to being    fairly valued. That might seem like a ridiculous claim to make when    Chinese wages and prices are still well below the global average.   Consider,  however, that the same is true for the majority of emerging   market  economies, including those that don’t peg their currencies to   the dollar. That doesn’t mean that the yuan won’t – or that it shouldn’t   –  continue to rise. In fact, the PBOC needs to do more to ensure that   the  Yuan appreciates evenly against all currencies, since most of the   yuan’s  rise to-date has taken place relative to the US  Dollar. It’s   merely a commentary that the PBOC is close to fulfilling the promises  it  has made regarding the yuan, and  going forward, I think that  observers  should expect that its forex policy will be reconfigured to  promote   domestic macroeconomic policy objectives.
0 comments: